Journal: BMC Clinical Pathology

Article Title: Conventional liquid-based techniques versus Cytyc Thinprep ® processing of urinary samples: a qualitative approach

doi: 10.1186/1472-6890-5-9

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of smears versus Thinprep slides (mean values, standard deviations and statistical significance).

Article Snippet: Cytyc Thinprep processing, owing to its cost, could be used essentially for cytology-based molecular studies.

Techniques:

Journal: BMC Clinical Pathology

Article Title: Conventional liquid-based techniques versus Cytyc Thinprep ® processing of urinary samples: a qualitative approach

doi: 10.1186/1472-6890-5-9

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of cytocentrifugation using reusable TPX chambers versus Thinprep slides (mean values, standard deviations and statistical significance).

Article Snippet: Cytyc Thinprep processing, owing to its cost, could be used essentially for cytology-based molecular studies.

Techniques:

Journal: BMC Clinical Pathology

Article Title: Conventional liquid-based techniques versus Cytyc Thinprep ® processing of urinary samples: a qualitative approach

doi: 10.1186/1472-6890-5-9

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of cytocentrifugation using disposable Cytofunnels (for samples up to 0.5 ml) versus Thinprep slides (mean values, standard deviations and statistical significance).

Article Snippet: Cytyc Thinprep processing, owing to its cost, could be used essentially for cytology-based molecular studies.

Techniques:

Journal: BMC Clinical Pathology

Article Title: Conventional liquid-based techniques versus Cytyc Thinprep ® processing of urinary samples: a qualitative approach

doi: 10.1186/1472-6890-5-9

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of cytocentrifugation using disposable Megafunnels (for samples up to 6 ml) versus Thinprep slides (mean values, standard deviations and statistical significance).

Article Snippet: Cytyc Thinprep processing, owing to its cost, could be used essentially for cytology-based molecular studies.

Techniques:

Journal: BMC Clinical Pathology

Article Title: Conventional liquid-based techniques versus Cytyc Thinprep ® processing of urinary samples: a qualitative approach

doi: 10.1186/1472-6890-5-9

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of Millipore filtration followed by blotting of cells on coated slides versus Thinprep slides (mean values, standard deviations and statistical significance).

Article Snippet: Cytyc Thinprep processing, owing to its cost, could be used essentially for cytology-based molecular studies.

Techniques: Filtration

Journal: BMC Clinical Pathology

Article Title: Conventional liquid-based techniques versus Cytyc Thinprep ® processing of urinary samples: a qualitative approach

doi: 10.1186/1472-6890-5-9

Figure Lengend Snippet: Group of low grade urothelial tumour cells together with normal superficial cells obtained after liquid based (Thinprep) processing. Papanicolaou stain, x 630.

Article Snippet: Cytyc Thinprep processing, owing to its cost, could be used essentially for cytology-based molecular studies.

Techniques: Papanicolaou Stain

Journal: British Journal of Cancer

Article Title: Cervical histology after routine ThinPrep or SurePath liquid-based cytology and computer-assisted reading in Denmark

doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.339

Figure Lengend Snippet: Description of phases by laboratory

Article Snippet: Unlike in our study, both ThinPrep and FocalPoint were inferior in detecting high-grade CIN; compared with manual reading, the relative sensitivity for ⩾CIN2 was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.87–0.98) for ThinPrep and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85–0.96) for FocalPoint.

Techniques: Imaging

Journal: British Journal of Cancer

Article Title: Cervical histology after routine ThinPrep or SurePath liquid-based cytology and computer-assisted reading in Denmark

doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.339

Figure Lengend Snippet: Primary cytology samples and histological outcomes after 2.5-year follow-up a

Article Snippet: Unlike in our study, both ThinPrep and FocalPoint were inferior in detecting high-grade CIN; compared with manual reading, the relative sensitivity for ⩾CIN2 was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.87–0.98) for ThinPrep and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85–0.96) for FocalPoint.

Techniques: Imaging

Journal: British Journal of Cancer

Article Title: Cervical histology after routine ThinPrep or SurePath liquid-based cytology and computer-assisted reading in Denmark

doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.339

Figure Lengend Snippet: Effect of full implementation of SurePath/FocalPoint or ThinPrep LBC and computer-assisted reading (last phase) a

Article Snippet: Unlike in our study, both ThinPrep and FocalPoint were inferior in detecting high-grade CIN; compared with manual reading, the relative sensitivity for ⩾CIN2 was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.87–0.98) for ThinPrep and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85–0.96) for FocalPoint.

Techniques: Imaging

Journal: British Journal of Cancer

Article Title: Cervical histology after routine ThinPrep or SurePath liquid-based cytology and computer-assisted reading in Denmark

doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.339

Figure Lengend Snippet: Frequency of histologically confirmed ⩾CIN2, by laboratory and phase. Roskilde: manually read conventional cytology in all phases. Hvidovre and Hillerød: SurePath/FocalPoint reading and liquid-based cytology technologies. Odense: ThinPrep reading and liquid-based cytology technologies. ○, 23–29 years; □, 30–44 years; ◊, 45–59 years. Phases as described in . CPH M, Copenhagen Municipality.

Article Snippet: Unlike in our study, both ThinPrep and FocalPoint were inferior in detecting high-grade CIN; compared with manual reading, the relative sensitivity for ⩾CIN2 was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.87–0.98) for ThinPrep and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85–0.96) for FocalPoint.

Techniques:

Journal: British Journal of Cancer

Article Title: Cervical histology after routine ThinPrep or SurePath liquid-based cytology and computer-assisted reading in Denmark

doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.339

Figure Lengend Snippet: Frequency of histologically confirmed

Article Snippet: Unlike in our study, both ThinPrep and FocalPoint were inferior in detecting high-grade CIN; compared with manual reading, the relative sensitivity for ⩾CIN2 was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.87–0.98) for ThinPrep and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85–0.96) for FocalPoint.

Techniques:

Journal: British Journal of Cancer

Article Title: Cervical histology after routine ThinPrep or SurePath liquid-based cytology and computer-assisted reading in Denmark

doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.339

Figure Lengend Snippet: Frequency of false-positive tests for ⩾CIN2 (samples with abnormal cytology that were not followed by a histological diagnosis of ⩾CIN2), by laboratory and phase. Roskilde: manually read conventional cytology in all phases. Hvidovre and Hillerød: SurePath/FocalPoint reading and liquid-based cytology technologies. Odense: ThinPrep reading and liquid-based cytology technologies. ○, 23–29 years; □, 30–44 years; ◊, 45–59 years. Phases as described in . CPH M, Copenhagen Municipality.

Article Snippet: Unlike in our study, both ThinPrep and FocalPoint were inferior in detecting high-grade CIN; compared with manual reading, the relative sensitivity for ⩾CIN2 was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.87–0.98) for ThinPrep and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85–0.96) for FocalPoint.

Techniques: Biomarker Discovery

Journal: British Journal of Cancer

Article Title: Cervical histology after routine ThinPrep or SurePath liquid-based cytology and computer-assisted reading in Denmark

doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.339

Figure Lengend Snippet: Laboratory with ThinPrep cytological technology (Odense) a

Article Snippet: Unlike in our study, both ThinPrep and FocalPoint were inferior in detecting high-grade CIN; compared with manual reading, the relative sensitivity for ⩾CIN2 was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.87–0.98) for ThinPrep and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85–0.96) for FocalPoint.

Techniques: Imaging